Single Static Assignment Optimization

Introduction

In compiler design, static single assignment form (often abbreviated as SSA form or SSA) is an intermediate representation (IR) in which every variable is assigned exactly once.

An SSA-based compiler modifies the program representation so that every time a variable is assigned in the original program, a new version of the variable is created.
A new version of the variable is distinguished (renamed) by subscripting the variable name with its version number or an index, so that every definition of each variable in a program becomes unique.
At a joining point of the control flow graph where two or more different definitions of a variable meet, a hypothetical function called a phi-function is inserted so that these multiple definitions are merged.

In mikroC PRO for ARM, SSA's main goal is in allocating local variables into the RX space (instead onto the frame).
To do that, SSA has to make an alias and data flow analysis of the Control Flow Graph.

Besides these savings, there are a number of compiler optimization algorithms enhanced by the use of SSA, like :

Changes that SSA brings is also in the way in which routine parameters are passed. When the SSA is enabled, parameters are passed through a part of the RX space which is reserved exclusively for this purpose.
Allocating local variables and parameters in RX space has its true meaning for those architectures with hardware frame.

Enabling SSA optimization in compiler is done by checking SSA Optimization box from the Output Settings Menu.

Lets consider a trivial case :

void SSA_Test(int y, int k) {
  if (y+k)
    asm nop
}

void main() {
  SSA_Test(5,5);
}

With SSA enabled, this example is consisted of 4 asm instructions :

; k end address is: 4 (R1)
; y end address is: 0 (R0)
; y start address is: 0 (R0)
; k start address is: 4 (R1)
0x0114        0x1842          ADD      R2, R0, R1
0x0116        0xB212          SXTH     R2, R2
; y end address is: 0 (R0)
; k end address is: 4 (R1)
0x0118        0xB102          CBZ      R2, L_SSA_Test0
;Example.c, 3  :: asm nop
0x011A        0xBF00          NOP

Without SSA enabled, this example is consisted of 6 asm instructions :

0x0114	     0xF9BD1004      LDRSH	   R1, [SP, #4]
0x0118	     0xF9BD0000      LDRSH	   R0, [SP, #0]
0x011C	     0x1840          ADD	   R0, R0, R1
0x011E	     0xB200          SXTH	   R0, R0
0x0120	     0xB100          CBZ	   R0, L_SSA_Test0
;Example.c, 3  :: asm nop
0x0122	     0xBF00          NOP

Proper Coding Recommendations

To get the maximum out of the SSA, user should regard the following rules during the coding process :

  Notes :

Debugging Notes

SSA also influences the code debugging in such a way that the local variables will be available in the Watch Window only in those parts of the procedure where they have useful value (eg. on entering the procedure, variable isn't available until its definition).
Variables can be allocated in one part of the procedure in register W4, and in another part of the procedure in register W2, if the optimizer estimates that it is better that way. That means that the local variable has no static address.

Warning Messages Enhancement

Besides the smaller code, SSA also deals with the intensive code analysis, which in turn has the consequence in enhancing the warning messages.
For example, compiler will warn the user that the uninitialized variable is used :

void main() {
  int y;

  if (y)        // Variable y might not have been initialized
    GPIO_PORTD = 0;
}    
Copyright (c) 2002-2012 mikroElektronika. All rights reserved.
What do you think about this topic ? Send us feedback!
Want more examples and libraries? 
Find them on LibStock - A place for the code